Rode NT4 Print E-mail
Written by David Plummer   

{mosreview}manufacturer=Rode/product=NT4/website=www.rode.com.au/price=269/score=4{/mosreview}

David Plummer is loaned a Rode NT4, owing to a delayed microphone order and decides to take it through it paces before returning it. In this review he tries to lift the lid on usability of this microphone in detail.

 

What is it?

The Rode NT4 is an active stereo microphone comprising a matched pair of ½-inch Small Diaphragm Condenser transducers permanently fixed in an XY configuration. The electronics comprises a J-FET impedance converter with a bipolar output buffer. These can be powered both by phantom power up to 48V and by a PP3 9V battery for portable use. The manufacturer reports a battery life of up to 400 hours.

Rode NT4


What applications can you use it for?

The unit has been designed specifically for both studio and location use, but is likely to suffer from a degree of moisture sensitivity when used outdoors as is typical of most Small Diaphragm Condensers. The supplied windshield is recommended for indoor use only. The manufacturers recommend ordering windshields for external use from www.rycote.com.


The NT4 Instruction Guide lists the following suggested applications:


Suggested Application Recommended Methodology
Stereo Drum Overhead Overhead rear position, centred behind drummer
Vocal Groups Centred front position at head level
Grand Piano
Overhead centred position
Acoustic Guitar Centred front position at guitar level
Bands / Choirs Position dependent on acoustic conditions
Stereo Location Recording Position dependent on ambience required

So what will it cost you?

Unlike many other published reviews, I feel it is important to get the issue of cost into the open up front. There is little point lusting over a Neumann U87 or Lexicon PCM91 which both would cost you around £1,400 new, (apart from the usual reasons of gear lust and envy), if you only have a couple of hundred pounds in the kitty.

High Street Retail Cost

Originally the items wouldn’t leave the checkout until you had parted with just shy of £500. However, time and demand have slowly worked the price down to quoted retail prices as follows: -

UK BEST FIVE PRICES*
www.nusystems.co.uk £269.00
www.gak.co.uk £270.00
www.dv247.com £270.99
www.turnkey.co.uk £270.99
www.soundslive.co.uk £270.99
*Correct as at 23/09/2004.
So what do you get for your money?
Rode NT4

Presented, as I was, with the ubiquitous cardboard box so common in new musical purchases these days, the thrill of a microphone on free loan was slightly dulled by the time I got home. However, I made my other half a cup of tea and carefully slit open the package.


Inside the box was a rugged plastic storage case, (above), containing the NT4, the indoor foam wind shield mentioned earlier, a rubber microphone mount with a thread adapter and two sets of leads – one for twin balanced XLR and one for stereo mini jack. As this microphone had been built with both studio and location applications in mind I was interested to see if this one-size-fits-all approach would lead to compromises in design and performance.

Examining the accessories, the plastic storage case looked tough enough, although I did wonder how long the sliding closures at the front would stand up to continued use, particular on location projects. The foam partitioning inside was sensibly laid out and of sufficient density to provide a good level of protection from the rigours of transit. The windshield appeared adequate, but owing to the need to place it over microphones facing in opposite directions, I suspected it might need to be replaced with something more robust over time. The rubber microphone mount was of the "Squeeze-in" type and looked adequate for the purpose but provided relatively little protection stand-borne noise being quite rigid in character. The thread adapter was of good quality. Finally, the two provided connector leads were medium to good quality and on testing both worked with very little noise. If this microphone were to become a location staple for you, I would recommend having some more durable ones made up.

Turning to the microphone itself, the unit had a well-manufactured appearance, with a simple sturdy construction. Aesthetically, it will probably not win over any clients to your cause. I remember my first reaction when I saw one on sale on eBay around a year ago. It was something like… "What’s that?" However if you take time to explore beyond the slightly awkward looks, what you discover is mostly very pleasing.

At just 480 grammes, the unit weighs considerably less than two Small Diaphragm Condensers and a T-Bar. Other technical specifications are above average for middle market microphones and in the price range this unit now falls into, quite impressive.


Technical Specifications*
Capsule: 2 x ½" condenser transducers Maximum Output: +13.9dBu @ 1% THD into 1k
Electronics: J-FET impedance converter Dynamic Range: >128dB
Pickup pattern:(each capsule) Cardoid Maximum SPL: 143dB @ 1% THD into 1k
Output impedance: 200 Ohms Signal / Noise Ratio: 78dB
Frequency Response:
20Hz – 20kHz
Power Requirement: P48, P24, P12 phantom or 9V PP3 battery
Sensitivity: -38dB re 1v/Pa +/- 2dB equivalent to 12mV/Pa where 1Pa=94dBSPL Packed Weight: 2.3 Kg – (NT4 only 480g)
Equivalent Noise: lt;16dB SPL Dimensions: L:232mm, Diam: 32mm
*Specifications per manufacturers Instruction Guide.

The microphone curve for the unit is not exactly flat or particularly shaped as in higher specification mics such as the Neumann KM184 or AKG C451B. However, it is certainly acceptable for a unit in its class. There are some challenges presented by the presence peaks in this graph, particularly the one between 80-250Hz, but more of this later.

Rode NT4

Source: http://www.microphone-data.com

What is the NT4 like to use?

Once you put the NT4 to use both its strengths and weaknesses are immediately obvious. On the plus side, mounting and placing the microphone is simplicity itself. The 2 x XLR adapter lead was connected to two Mic inputs on my desk via two 5m XLR cables. The microphone mount was simply screwed to a Quiklok boom stand for maximum flexibility and the NT4 slid into place. I applied phantom power to both channels and switch the microphone on. With up to 60dB of gain available on my A&H desk, I wanted to get a general feel of the noise of the NT4. So I applied a relatively aggressive 40dB to being with and started by singing a few test notes around 6 feet away from the Mic to get a feel of its general pickup potential before giving it a more thorough run through to assess its potential for recording vocals.

Voice
As you might expect in a small untreated room there was quite some reverb, but reproduction was strong and clean. Moving closer to the NT4 to get my voice only, my more usual baritone warble sounded pretty accurate, (faults and all), whilst my falsetto was felt considerably freer and more airy than usual. This microphone may well compliment male voices that use falsetto techniques a lot in their performance. This could be a good choice of barbershop quartet Mic. The airy character of the Mic might need a little taming for use with the spoken word, but the ability of the NT4 to pick up spoken word from two people sat opposite each other might be useful where space is restricted.

Acoustic Guitar

Front Mounted:
Using the NT4 for this purpose took a little more time to get used to. The problem with the XY configuration in closer Mic applications is that you are pretty much forced to point one of the capsules towards the sound hole, which at reasonable gains is not an ideal solution. Twisting the NT4 on its axis alleviated this problem but also reduced the size of the stereo field. The best solution to this problem seems to be to sit at 45 degrees to the mic which creates a natural stereo lean to one side or the other, dependent on which way up you mount the mic. However, in this configuration you a repaid with some very pleasant tones and timbre.

Just one extra thought:
My room is carpeted, hence I was not able to experiment, however I would very much like to try pointing one capsule at the neck just beyond the sound hole and one at a wood floor to pick up reflections to see what the results are like.

Shoulder Mounted:
Over the shoulder mounting provided pleasing results, but did lead to some phase reinforcement problems in terms on a low/mid-range honk when used in conjunction with an SE2200A to pick up vocals. This was probably because of the proximity of the microphones and the unavoidable high level of bleed between all three capsules. In addition, the main frequency peak of this Mic covers the entire band of frequencies for the acoustic guitar from open low-E at 82.4Hz to open B at 246.9Hz. Combined with a similar response peak in the SE2200A starting at around 150Hz this could account for my difficulties. Careful repositioning of both microphones eventually solved my problem. Although I felt it unhelpful that this microphone had a boost in the area of the fundamental notes for stringed instruments.

So what do you think?

The Rode NT4 is certainly is a go anywhere Mic with all the benefits that entails. But it is not a do anything Mic. Your £270 buys you a fixed XY configuration and that is that. You cannot vary the angle or use the Mics as supplied in some of the other useful two Mic configurations. With a little imagination, however, I could see this unit being a mid-budget stalwart. Both capsules can be independently externally powered, so the NT4 could double up as another Small Diaphragm Condenser in your mic collection, adding to it’s attractiveness as a mobile recording tool. If you are prepared to accept that the NT4 is a mobile, good quality Mic limited to XY applications in stereo, then I thoroughly recommend an extended tryout. The price you pay is the old Henry Ford maxim: "You can have any colour, as long as it’s black!"…Or in this case XY.

Further reading:

Paul White http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/Aug02/articles/rodent4nt5.asp
Electronic Musician http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0FGL/is_2002_Oct_1/ai_92187862
Mix http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0HEO/is_12_26/ai_93579420
Rode http://www.rode.com.au/

As you might expect in a small untreated room there was quite some reverb, but reproduction was strong and clean. Moving closer to the NT4 to get my voice only, my more usual baritone warble sounded pretty accurate, , whilst my falsetto was felt considerably freer and more airy than usual. This microphone may well compliment male voices that use falsetto techniques a lot in their performance. . The airy character of the Mic might need a little taming for use with the spoken word, but the ability of the NT4 to pick up spoken word from two people sat opposite each other might be useful where space is restricted.