| Rode NT4 |
|
|
| Written by David Plummer | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
{mosreview}manufacturer=Rode/product=NT4/website=www.rode.com.au/price=269/score=4{/mosreview} David Plummer is loaned a Rode NT4, owing to a delayed microphone order and decides to take it through it paces before returning it. In this review he tries to lift the lid on usability of this microphone in detail.
What is it? The
Rode NT4 is an active stereo microphone comprising a matched pair of
½-inch Small Diaphragm Condenser transducers permanently fixed in an XY
configuration. The electronics comprises a J-FET impedance converter
with a bipolar output buffer. These can be powered both by phantom
power up to 48V and by a PP3 9V battery for portable use. The
manufacturer reports a battery life of up to 400 hours. ![]() What applications can you use it for? The
unit has been designed specifically for both studio and location use,
but is likely to suffer from a degree of moisture sensitivity when used
outdoors as is typical of most Small Diaphragm Condensers. The supplied
windshield is recommended for indoor use only. The manufacturers
recommend ordering windshields for external use from www.rycote.com. The NT4 Instruction Guide lists the following suggested applications:
So what will it cost you? Unlike
many other published reviews, I feel it is important to get the issue
of cost into the open up front. There is little point lusting over a
Neumann U87 or Lexicon PCM91 which both would cost you around £1,400
new, (apart from the usual reasons of gear lust and envy), if you only have a couple of hundred pounds in the kitty. High Street Retail Cost Originally
the items wouldn’t leave the checkout until you had parted with just
shy of £500. However, time and demand have slowly worked the price down
to quoted retail prices as follows: - UK BEST FIVE PRICES* www.nusystems.co.uk £269.00 www.gak.co.uk £270.00 www.dv247.com £270.99 www.turnkey.co.uk £270.99 www.soundslive.co.uk £270.99 *Correct as at 23/09/2004. So what do you get for your money? ![]() Presented,
as I was, with the ubiquitous cardboard box so common in new musical
purchases these days, the thrill of a microphone on free loan was
slightly dulled by the time I got home. However, I made my other half a
cup of tea and carefully slit open the package. Inside
the box was a rugged plastic storage case, (above), containing the NT4,
the indoor foam wind shield mentioned earlier, a rubber microphone
mount with a thread adapter and two sets of leads – one for twin
balanced XLR and one for stereo mini jack. As this microphone had been
built with both studio and location applications in mind I was
interested to see if this one-size-fits-all approach would lead to
compromises in design and performance. Examining
the accessories, the plastic storage case looked tough enough, although
I did wonder how long the sliding closures at the front would stand up
to continued use, particular on location projects. The foam
partitioning inside was sensibly laid out and of sufficient density to
provide a good level of protection from the rigours of transit. The
windshield appeared adequate, but owing to the need to place it over
microphones facing in opposite directions, I suspected it might need to
be replaced with something more robust over time. The rubber microphone
mount was of the "Squeeze-in" type and looked adequate for the purpose
but provided relatively little protection stand-borne noise being quite
rigid in character. The thread adapter was of good quality. Finally,
the two provided connector leads were medium to good quality and on
testing both worked with very little noise. If this microphone were to
become a location staple for you, I would recommend having some more
durable ones made up. Turning to the
microphone itself, the unit had a well-manufactured appearance, with a
simple sturdy construction. Aesthetically, it will probably not win
over any clients to your cause. I remember my first reaction when I saw
one on sale on eBay around a year ago. It was something like… "What’s
that?" However if you take time to explore beyond the slightly awkward
looks, what you discover is mostly very pleasing. At
just 480 grammes, the unit weighs considerably less than two Small
Diaphragm Condensers and a T-Bar. Other technical specifications are
above average for middle market microphones and in the price range this
unit now falls into, quite impressive.
The
microphone curve for the unit is not exactly flat or particularly
shaped as in higher specification mics such as the Neumann KM184 or AKG
C451B. However, it is certainly acceptable for a unit in its class.
There are some challenges presented by the presence peaks in this
graph, particularly the one between 80-250Hz, but more of this later. ![]() Source: http://www.microphone-data.com What is the NT4 like to use? Once
you put the NT4 to use both its strengths and weaknesses are
immediately obvious. On the plus side, mounting and placing the
microphone is simplicity itself. The 2 x XLR adapter lead was connected
to two Mic inputs on my desk via two 5m XLR cables. The microphone
mount was simply screwed to a Quiklok boom stand for maximum
flexibility and the NT4 slid into place. I applied phantom power to
both channels and switch the microphone on. With up to 60dB of gain
available on my A&H desk, I wanted to get a general feel of the
noise of the NT4. So I applied a relatively aggressive 40dB to being
with and started by singing a few test notes around 6 feet away from
the Mic to get a feel of its general pickup potential before giving it
a more thorough run through to assess its potential for recording
vocals. Voice As you might expect in a small untreated room there was quite some reverb, but reproduction was strong and clean. Moving closer to the NT4 to get my voice only, my more usual baritone warble sounded pretty accurate, (faults and all), whilst my falsetto was felt considerably freer and more airy than usual. This microphone may well compliment male voices that use falsetto techniques a lot in their performance. This could be a good choice of barbershop quartet Mic. The airy character of the Mic might need a little taming for use with the spoken word, but the ability of the NT4 to pick up spoken word from two people sat opposite each other might be useful where space is restricted. Acoustic Guitar Front Mounted: Using
the NT4 for this purpose took a little more time to get used to. The
problem with the XY configuration in closer Mic applications is that
you are pretty much forced to point one of the capsules towards the
sound hole, which at reasonable gains is not an ideal solution.
Twisting the NT4 on its axis alleviated this problem but also reduced
the size of the stereo field. The best solution to this problem seems
to be to sit at 45 degrees to the mic which creates a natural stereo
lean to one side or the other, dependent on which way up you mount the
mic. However, in this configuration you a repaid with some very
pleasant tones and timbre. Just one extra thought: My room is carpeted, hence I was not able to experiment, however I would very much like to try pointing one capsule at the neck just beyond the sound hole and one at a wood floor to pick up reflections to see what the results are like. Shoulder Mounted: Over the shoulder mounting provided pleasing results, but did lead to some phase reinforcement problems in terms on a low/mid-range honk when used in conjunction with an SE2200A to pick up vocals. This was probably because of the proximity of the microphones and the unavoidable high level of bleed between all three capsules. In addition, the main frequency peak of this Mic covers the entire band of frequencies for the acoustic guitar from open low-E at 82.4Hz to open B at 246.9Hz. Combined with a similar response peak in the SE2200A starting at around 150Hz this could account for my difficulties. Careful repositioning of both microphones eventually solved my problem. Although I felt it unhelpful that this microphone had a boost in the area of the fundamental notes for stringed instruments. So what do you think? The Rode NT4 is certainly is a go anywhere Mic with all the benefits that entails. But it is not a do anything Mic. Your
£270 buys you a fixed XY configuration and that is that. You cannot
vary the angle or use the Mics as supplied in some of the other useful
two Mic configurations. With a little imagination, however, I could see
this unit being a mid-budget stalwart. Both capsules can be
independently externally powered, so the NT4 could double up as another
Small Diaphragm Condenser in your mic collection, adding to it’s
attractiveness as a mobile recording tool. If you are prepared to
accept that the NT4 is a mobile, good quality Mic limited to XY
applications in stereo, then I thoroughly recommend an extended tryout.
The price you pay is the old Henry Ford maxim: "You can have any
colour, as long as it’s black!"…Or in this case XY.
Further reading: As you might expect in a small untreated room there was quite some reverb, but reproduction was strong and clean. Moving closer to the NT4 to get my voice only, my more usual baritone warble sounded pretty accurate, , whilst my falsetto was felt considerably freer and more airy than usual. This microphone may well compliment male voices that use falsetto techniques a lot in their performance. . The airy character of the Mic might need a little taming for use with the spoken word, but the ability of the NT4 to pick up spoken word from two people sat opposite each other might be useful where space is restricted.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||








